Republican Debate for Adams County Commissioner

For those who could not be in attendance at the Republican Candidate for Adams County Commissioner debate April 9th at the Brethren Home Nicarry Meeting House, I would like to share my answers to the questions presented there, as well as two topics that were not discussed.  This is my Vision for the Future of Adams County.

COUNTY BUDGET

I am a true fiscal conservative.  In developing the 2013 McSherrystown budget, I formulated a plan to stave off a proposed tax increase AND sewer base rate increase (both of which I voted against), and proposed increasing the sewer usage rates. This would have protected seniors and those on fixed incomes, promoting responsible water conservation, while affording funds for the necessary infrastructure repairs.

The usage rate increase would expire in three years, after providing the funds needed, at the end of which the rates would have been lowered to their original levels. 

As Adams County Commissioner, one of my first actions would be to place a moratorium on an Ordinance passed Feb 6, 2013 by the current Board of Commissioners to increase the pay of the three Commissioners, starting next year.  This would create a savings to the county of over $18K in salary expenses.

I would also support a wage freeze on Commissioner compensation while I hold office.  I would encourage other departments to follow suit in finding savings through regular department VAM meetings.

The County Prison budget is over $10M. I have spoken to prison employees who tell me their suggestions are going unheard, and they are experiencing a declining faith the leadership of the current Commissioners.  I have spoken with residents who tell me they are tired of paying to feed and house non-violent offenders, tarnishing their futures instead of rehabilitating productive citizens.  

I have also been asked by constituents why we need a County Manager, at a cost of over $100K/yr., when we supposedly have three "full-time Commissioners".

We must reduce spending and increase revenues, not the other way around.  County Commissioners must facilitate the expansion of the tax base and reduce individual contributions, putting more discretionary spending into local economy.

I shall detail my vision of how we can help make that happen in the following topics.

EMERGENCY SERVICES

During my tenure on McSherrystown Council, I have attended many seminars and conferences hosted by the Pennsylvania State Association of Boroughs.  I have received training in Police Contract Negotiations, Volunteer Fire Department Liability Laws, Regionalization Processes, and more.  I am currently certified by FEMA and the Department of Homeland Security in National Incident Management Systems.

I am an Advocate of Regionalization. Its proven benefits include long-term cost savings through consolidation of services, improved coordination and reduced response times, to name a few.  I have been a vocal proponent of a police regionalization effort centering around Conewago Township and McSherrystown for some time, as posted several years ago in my blog, councilmanbolton.blogspot.com. Along with Mayor Tony Weaver, I have attended these meetings and supported the realization of a regional force.  We are making progress and hope to have our combined team ready within the year. 

With the loss of WellSpan ALS, county responders are doing a fantastic job organizing to fill the gap. SAVES & Hanover Hospital (Medic 46 stationed), efforts by United and local officials, and a meeting next week in Biglerville for municipalities in their surrounding area.  I am involved with these efforts to supply for the needs of The People.

Experiencing declining numbers at volunteer fire stations as memberships grow older, our companies are having a harder time raising funds.  I authored the Adams County Boroughs Association Small Games of Chance Resolution two years ago. It was designed to help local service clubs increase community contributions by raising the aggregate prize limits.  Although we wanted to eliminate the ceilings completely, Gov. Corbett allowed a $10K/week increase, demanding other reforms, such as giving public bars licenses but keeping the community portion for the state coffers.

Government does not have the right to tell you how to spend your money. Putting money into the SGOC system through service clubs puts more money into your communities and helps support your Police and Fire Departments.  We have a K9 unit in McSherrystown, fully funded by donations, much of which comes from SGOC.  Our fire company, SAVES, relies on their own fundraising efforts and the contributions from the local service clubs.  I will continue to work to help keep our safety infrastructure healthy and saving lives.

PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS

Speaking with citizens of the county, they feel the previous administration fumbled the reassessment, however, the current administration capitalized on that to gain election, promising correction.  These same citizens do not feel that the correction processes implemented have been most beneficial to average homeowner.  They also feel that the recent appeal awards, like those granted to Utz and Knouse Foods (not to disagree with those companies' rights to their appeal award), will create greater issues moving forward when those funds, mandated to repayment in lieu of tax credits,will create a hole in the upcoming budgets.

I have seen many homes on the market that are being sold “under market value”. Are they a great deal, or part of the “bubble” created by the flawed assessment processes over the last five years, and they Will burst, leaving Adams County residents with a gapping hole in their county budget, possibly prompting yet another tax increase? I believe 2 tax increases in the past three years-over 10%-is more than enough to ask from our citizens.

When do we finally say “Enough” and utilize Pro-Active Solutions instead of being Re-Active?  When do we expect more vision and common sense from our leaders?  When will our leaders stop expecting more from its citizens instead of our citizens expecting more from our leaders?

My Ag-Economic Plan for the Future of Adams County may help to answer a few of these questions.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

On November 17, 2014, I presented a resolution, in favor of Industrial Hemp Cultivation, to the ACBA. It was the first piece of municipal legislation in modern state history to bring back an industry to our county & state which once thrived.  Hemp was one of the four staples of PA agriculture up until the 1930s. 

The resolution passed unanimously.

Since then, 19 municipalities have confirmed adoption of resolutions in favor of starting pilot studies to reconfirm the feasibility of hemp cultivation on our lands.  Senate Bill 50, taking its cue partially from ACBA efforts, will allow private participation of county farmers in these studies.

Instead of using TIF monies to fund corporate welfare for a single store or to help private for-profit businesses sell homes, let’s secure hemp harvesting & processing equipment, use it in conjunction with the County Agriculture Department & Penn State Co-op Extension, and start cultivating & processing this $50B Dollar Crop.  Once legal, allow farmers to lease the equipment, to reduce market penetration costs, allowing them to grow and then purchase their own equipment in the thriving industry.

Instead of building a store or a development, let’s build an industry that is proven to be profitable to the estimate of $350 per acre according to the Pennsylvania Hemp Company.  Let's use TIF money to eliminate blight & restore industrial facilities to attract companies to process & sell Adams County hemp.

Currently, Senate Bill 201 in Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee amends “Clean and Green” Laws to allow landowners up to 2 acres of designated lands for the operation of a rural enterprise which is incidental to the tract of land enrolled.  What does this mean for the future of Adams County farming?  It means we can continue to preserve lands, like those secured by our Land Conservancy, while still giving the landowners an opportunity for greater profitability by running a Farmer’s Market, or performing farm equipment repair as a business on those lands.  It would allow our future hemp farmers to process and manufacture their own crops into goods, increasing their revenues, creating jobs, revitalizing our economy!

Rep. Scott Perry has since co-sponsored an Industrial Hemp Bill in the US House.  Rep. Dan Moul has recently co-sponsored an Industrial Hemp Bill in the PA House. Ag-Economic opportunity is here.  As Commissioner, I will continue to see through this Vision for the future of Adams County’s Agriculture & Economic Revitalization by providing the inspiration and leadership to produce and promote any viable Ag-Economic advantage to help our farmers and citizens thrive.

COUNTY POLICIES AND PROTOCOL

Speaking with citizens and courthouse employees alike, I hear they are concerned about the restructuring of the county offices that occurred under the current Administration.  I have also heard it expressed that every vote being 3-0 with little to no discussion at public meetings “doesn’t seem right”.

I will agree that I do not appreciate the dysfunctional displays of government in DC, but not EVERY vote should be unanimous, especially when the public is clearly expressing other opinions.  Most of the current administration’s meetings last 10-15 minutes at 9am on Wednesday mornings. As a blue collar worker, I cannot justify a day off to attend, especially when no real information is disseminated anyway, and when there is rarely a reply to public comment or questions to them.

As Commissioner, I would support holding one of the two monthly Commissioners meetings out in the county, in the evening, to promote greater participation and to gain greater insight as to how I can serve The People of Adams County.

In efforts to keep our citizens better informed, I would also suggest utilization of Community Media to film Commissioner Workshops; allowing People to hear the discussions & provide feedback prior to decisions being made without explanation.  I would also suggest policy be initiated where each Commissioner would be required to give a brief comment on each vote and what led them to their final decisions. This would help The People better understand the decisions our leaders struggle with for the good of the county, and would give all involved opportunities to grow together.  As Commissioner, I will support these initiatives to help create more transparency and understanding within the county.

Lately, you may have heard the words "Experience", "Leadership", "Vision" and "Common Sense" thrown around a bit. When a candidate uses these words, please pause for a moment to see if what preceded or follows their usage actually defines a previous demonstration or a plan to demonstrate such in the future.

I hope I have demonstrated leadership in fiscal conservancy with my words and my votes as a Councilman, and have shared here specific, measurable ideas that are ready for implementation to cut county budget costs immediately. 

No other candidates have given such a Vision for the Future of our County.

I hope I have demonstrated my commitment to our emergency services and police departments time and again through my involvements in public service, in the community, in educating myself to better serve The People, and by authoring legislation to provide for such. As County Commissioner, I will continue to support this vital part of our county infrastructure in any capacity deemed appropriate.

I have heard the concerns of The People concerning the effects of improper property assessments and the damage it causes our economy. I have shared their concerns to our future budgets and presented common sense solutions to these issues. I have demonstrated my experience as a seasoned legislator by taking the ideas of the People, putting them into words that formed legislation designed to make life better here in our county. Voter Referendum, Municipal Radar, Small Games and Industrial Hemp; initiatives which have given power back to communities to determine their own future instead of relying on state and federal government for more mandates and expenses.

I have outlined my Vision for common sense solutions to constituent disillusionment when it comes to the office of Commissioner by suggesting new policies and protocols designed to promote transparency and greater dialogue, which will generate even more ideas for the betterment of Adams County.

I hope I have given you enough to convince you that I am the right person to support on May 19^th, and I hope that you will agree by filling in the block next to the name David W. Bolton on your ballot.  Thank you all for being involved, for sharing these words with others, and may God continue to bless you and Adams County.  Thank You.  DB

David W. "Scotty" Bolton
McSherrystown Borough Council;
VP & Legislative Chair,
Adams County Boroughs Association;
Board of Directors, Resolution/Policy & Nomination Committee,
Pennsylvania State Association of Boroughs
councilmanbolton@gmail.com
Phone:  717-634-8726 
www.Bolton4Commish.com 

Higher Sewer Rates and Tax Increases...Here They Come!!!

**SPECIAL NOTICE: Due to a procedural error at our last meeting, the vote to advertise the budget was never formalized, because it was never officially stated that the motion carried...so there will be a "Special Meeting" on Wednesday, November 20th at 7pm to vote on advertising the budget. We will be conducting the remainder of business that night and the meeting scheduled for Nov. 27th will then be cancelled. Please make this change on your calendars!  DB 11/15/13

Thank you once again for taking the time to read my blog. I want to start today by thanking the good people of McSherrystown in their support of my re-election. I was at the polls all day, and had the chance to meet with many of you and discuss the various situations facing our community. Not a day goes by that someone doesn't mention how much we could use a leash law in our Borough, or how glad they are that someone is representing the "little guys" and defending their rights. It is true; I have faced some staunch opposition in my first two years on Council; from the proposed dog leash law, to my opposition of government infringement on your right to use the furniture you want on your private property, and my stance to bring voter referendum to our polls. Although I may have "lost" on each of these and other topics, I am filled with a sense of accomplishment in knowing that I have made the voice of The People heard, even if we were defeated by the long-standing figureheads with whom I serve. I will continue to serve YOU as the Vice-President of the Adams County Boroughs Association, the Legislative Committee Chair for Adams County to the PA State Association of Boroughs, on the Hanover Regional Economic Development Committee, and other assignments to come.

Today, however, I put any celebration aside, and am now ready to focus on the next four years of service to you.  It appears that the very figureheads I referenced above have specific plans for how our community government will be run during that time, and are opposed to implementing any suggestions that are not in-line with what "they" want for McSherrystown. I speak of the Municipal Budget for 2014.

I will be brief in my explanations of such, and as always, I am available to elaborate on anything that is not clear, for which I will back up my views with numbers and statistics, not opinion and personal fancy.

The first draft of the Municipal Budget allowed for a $28K deficit, of which I had addressed on Facebook previously (www.facebook.com/CouncilmanDavidBolton). In efforts to be a responsible steward of the community, I engaged on a week-long trek to find and eliminate any overspending to bring the budget to balance, as I had made it very clear that I would not vote in favor of any budget that is not so.  I am happy to report that the subsequent draft of the budget eliminates the "red", and I would like to thank Borough Manager Scott Cook and Secretary Luanne Boring for contacting the County Assessors, and for their investigation into the matter, which resulted in the discovery of additional revenues which were not accounted for in the first draft. These new numbers created a balanced budget, and as such, I will be supporting its adoption.

However, the reason for my blog today is not to gush over how good we, as administrators of the public trust, are doing a great job for The People, but to inform you of the instances of yesterday's Council meeting, and the subsequent recess to discuss the budget, followed by a re-convening of the stated meeting, in absence of the public or press, where the Council made motions to advertise not only the Budget, but also a change to the Tax Ordinance (with an increase of 1/2 mill for 2014) AND an increase in sewer rates within the same calendar year.

I will say this to begin: I do not want to increase any fiscal burdens on The People of McSherrystown unnecessarily, but I do recognize that our antiquated sewer system, which is well over 80 years old, is in dire need of repairs. These repairs are necessary if we are to provide adequate infrastructure to our community. The Council has been very frugal in their upkeep of this system, and with increased I&I each year (146% increase in 2011) contributing to the costs incurred by our residents beyond their actual water usage, it is imperative that we identify and mend the parts of our sewer system that create these increased costs, which will only become more of a burden the longer we ignore it. As such, I investigated the systems in place in our neighboring municipalities to fund such projects and devised a plan to generate the funds necessary for our system's improvements.

Currently, we have a two-tier system. A base rate of $35.60 for up to 4k gallons of usage per quarter, and then a $4.20 charge per 1k gallons thereafter. It was very important to me that we do not increase this base amount, as we have a large percentage of homes with fixed incomes and which do not generate a surplus of usage. We also have some very conservative homes that are conscientious of their usage. Therefore, I proposed two base rates: the first, being our current base rate, as a discounted base rate, so that these folks did not see an increase in their quarterly bills. The second tier base, which models that of Hanover Borough, would be set at 7k gallons for a flat rate of $54.00. Thereafter, the "per 1k gallon" cost would be set from $4.20 to $5.80 (which is $.95 less than Hanover Borough and in line with their 2007 rates, prior to their last increase). This rate would apply to usage up to 25k gallons, while the last tier would discount the "per 1k" rate to $5.70 (again, nearly a dollar less than Hanover Borough, from where our water comes and to where our waste goes). It is important to keep these rates competitive in order to attract new homeowners and businesses into our Borough, which will expand the tax base and lessen the tax burden on the individual (which is why I am so active in the Regional Economic Development Committee). These increased user rates would then fund our sewer repairs. The burden of the cost of the repairs would be on the shoulders of those who use the system the most, and would safe-guard our elderly and our conserving citizens. This plan would generate an estimated $80k to be used for this purpose, as the funds would be ear-marked to the Sewer Reserves account for the work to be done, which would include continuation of the camera work to identify sources of I&I, engineering fees to develop the plan of attack for the repairs, and of course the manpower and project costs to fix the system.

It was argued by a non-Council member in the meeting that he is "tired of hearing about a user-based fee. Yes, there are people with fixed incomes in town, but they should have to pay for the system also, regardless of how much they use. Are we going to strap the costs on a family with two or three kids that are already struggling just because they use more water?". My rebuttal was, "I AM one of those people you mention, and I would rather pay for it than to have someone on a fixed income give out more of their money, especially when they are keeping their usage to a minimum, which does not contribute to the wear and tear of the system as much as those who use more water."  Obviously, I lost the argument that we were undercutting our sewer rates and that we should follow my plan to generate revenues for the repairs, because the Council decided to increase the base rates from $35.60 to $42.40 on EVERYONE, while not increasing the "per 1k gallon" rate of $4.20 a single cent. This plan creates less than $9k in additional revenues and burdens those who have the least in our community. (In comparison, Conewago Township charges $.67 more per 1k gallon over 8k, and Hanover Borough charges $6.75 per 1k gallon over 7k gallons). So, how were we going to generate the remainder of the funds needed for the repairs?

It was suggested by the Finance Chairperson that, in addition to these sewer base-rate increases (which he proposed), we should raise our taxes in the Borough by .5 mills to generate the remaining funds, but not only for the sewer repairs, but to put more revenue into the General Fund for "other future endeavors". My argument was that if we were raising funds for the sewer repairs, then the sewer rates should generate those funds. However, those funds would be placed in sewer reserves and would not be accessible to the Finance Committee to fund the other "endeavors" without a full, public vote from the Council. Those "endeavors" were not specifically named at this time.

I was NOT the only current Council member to oppose this increase. If we do not have a current deficit, and we have an adequate amount of reserves currently, why do we need to raise taxes on EVERY property owner under the guise of sewer system repairs?  The funds to be raised by his proposal would generate roughly $70k-75k in new taxes that would NOT be specifically earmarked for anything in particular, although I was "re-assured" that monies would be placed into the sewer reserves for the repairs.

My apprehension to this idea is this: If these funds are not being raised and reserved for a specific purpose, with no restriction on what they can be used for, how can we be reassured that these funds will not be kept from their intended purpose of sewer system repairs?  An even larger question than that: What happens when we do need to raise taxes for a specific purpose in the future?

I believe that my proposal, whether you agree and want to call it a "user-fee" or not, is the most reliable and sensible plan to generate the funds needed for our sewer repairs. Once the repairs are completed, we can easily reduce the rates back down to a "maintenance" level, if you will.  However, what municipality has EVER reduced their tax rates, especially when they raised them under the guise of a repair project?

Our next meeting is Wednesday, November 27, the day before Thanksgiving. This will be the day that our leaders will vote on whether to raise your taxes and whether to burden our elderly and other responsible water users with increased base rates. If you have never been to a Council meeting, this is one that should start a trend for you. YOU have a say; YOU can stand before Council and tell them what you think.  I am out here voicing your concerns and defending those in the community that cannot defend themselves. I asked for your support in my re-election, and you gave generously. I now ask for your support in upholding my promise to represent each one of you in finding the best ways to make our community better for the future. The power of government lies in the hands of the governed. Let's join those hands.  PLEASE join me at that and all other meetings and make your voices heard!

Thank you.

For Liberty,

David "Scotty" Bolton
McSherrystown Borough Council and Citizen
717-634-8726
councilmanbolton@gmail.com